
That
is the gap between mindfulness and tone deafness. Mindfulness means seeing
clearly what is in front of you, and that includes the people who can't look
away. A version of it that only teaches us to trim our discomfort is not
awareness, but a more refined way of not looking. If mindfulness is truly about
being aware of the world around us, then it must extend beyond our personal
comfort and acknowledge the suffering of others.
Three
things separate the two. First, who is speaking to whom: advice built for
someone with the luxury of logging off lands differently on someone without it.
We must recognise that not everyone has the same privilege of distancing
themselves from a crisis. Second, what is being filtered: if the "bad
news" is only a mood, filter it. If it is someone's life, filtering it out
means ignoring them. Turning away from suffering does not make that suffering
disappear; it only makes us less willing to acknowledge it. Third, what comes
after the rest: calm should refill our capacity to care, not replace it. Taking
a break from distressing news is reasonable, but that break should allow us to
return with greater compassion, not permanent indifference.
Of
course, people need rest, and nobody should be shamed for protecting their
mental health. The point isn't to demand constant anxiety, but to say plainly
that the power to step back is not equally distributed, and a mindful voice
should say so out loud. Rather than simply scrolling past suffering, we should
make an effort to understand it, acknowledge those affected, and consider how
we can contribute, however modestly, to their well-being.
Be
mindful, by all means. But let your awareness include the people whose news you
can't unsee.
No comments:
Post a Comment